NASA Home The SGP99 Campaign
SGP99 Home | Experiment Plan | Participants | Links | Campaigns | DAAC Home

 

The Campaign
List markerSoil Moisture
List markerSoil Properties
List markerSoil Temperature
List markerVegetation and Land Cover
List markerAircraft Remote Sensing
List markerSatellite Remote Sensing

 

 

Passive/Active L/S-band Airborne Sensor (PALS)

 

SGP99 Experiment Data Description

(Document Version: 12/04/00)

Contents

1. Contact Information

2. Data Availability

3. PALS SGP99 Mission Overview

3.1 Objectives
3.2 Sensor Description
3.3 SGP99 Site Description
3.4 Flight Lines

4. Data Description

4.1 Data Quality
4.2 File Nomenclature
4.3 Radiometer Data Format
4.4 Radar Data Format

5. Reference

PALS Data Online Air Remote Sensing Page

 

1. Contact Information

Eni G. Njoku (Mission Scientist)
M/S 300-233
Jet Propulsion Laboratory
4800 Oak Grove Drive
Pasadena, CA 91109
(818) 354-3693
eni.g.njoku@jpl.nasa.gov

William J. Wilson (Radiometer Data)
M/S 168-327
Jet Propulsion Laboratory
4800 Oak Grove Drive
Pasadena, CA 91109
818-354-5699
william.j.wilson@jpl.nasa.gov

Simon H. Yueh (Radar Data)
M/S 300-235
Jet Propulsion Laboratory
4800 Oak Grove Drive
Pasadena, CA 91109
818-354-3012
simon.h.yueh@jpl.nasa.gov

 

2. Data Availability

The PALS data files from SGP99 reside on DAAC anonymous FTP. You may access them from this document,

FTP iconPALS Radiometer Data (ASCII) FTP iconPALS Radar Data (ASCII)

or directly via FTP at

ftp disc.gsfc.nasa.gov
login: anonymous
password: < your internet address >
cd http://disc.sci.gsfc.nasa.gov/data/sgp99/air_remote_sensing/pals

 

3. PALS SGP99 MISSION OVERVIEW

3.1 Objectives

The Passive/Active L/S-band sensor (PALS) was developed to study the use of multi-frequency, multi-polarization, passive and active data for remote sensing of ocean salinity and soil moisture (Wilson et al., 2001). The PALS instrument was flown for the first time during the July 1999 Southern Great Plains Soil Moisture Experiment (SGP99) near Chickasha, Oklahoma. The objectives of the PALS flights were: (1) to perform an engineering evaluation of the integrated passive-active sensor design, including noise performance, calibration stability, and radio-frequency interference (RFI); (2) to acquire simultaneous multi-polarization radiometer and radar L- and S-band data for development of improved models of land surface emission and backscatter, and for assessment of the potential of multi-channel/multi-sensor retrieval of soil moisture; and (3) in conjunction with data from C-band radiometers flown during SGP99, to compare the L-, S-, and C-band passive microwave signatures, and to optimize channel combinations over the 1- to 7-GHz frequency range, for improved sensor and algorithm design for possible future spaceborne systems.

 

3.2 Sensor Description

PALS was designed for high accuracy, sensitivity and stability, as driven by the ocean salinity application. The instrument operates at L band (1.41-GHz radiometer and 1.26-GHz radar) and S band (2.69-GHz radiometer and 3.15-GHz radar) with dual polarization (fully polarimetric radar). Two conical horn antennas are used (1.2-m-diameter at L band and 0.6-m-diameter at S band), preset at a fixed incidence angle between 35o and 55o. The instrument was designed to be flown on a C-130 aircraft, with the antennas viewing out the rear door directed downwards and to the rear of the aircraft. Views of the C-130 aircraft and the instrument mounted at the rear are shown in Figure 1. The instrument is non-scanning, thus a single-footprint track is sampled along the flight path. The key instrument characteristics are listed in Table I. Additional details of the instrument design and engineering performance are provided in Wilson et al. (2001).

aircraft & instrument photo

The L- and S-band radar and radiometer frequencies are not identical due to separate frequency-spectrum allocations for passive and active systems. To minimize interference the radiometers incorporate narrowband filters (20 MHz at L band and 5 MHz at S band). At a nominal flight altitude of 1 km, and incidence angle of 40o, the instantaneous 3-dB footprints of the horn antennas are approximately 300 x 400 m in all channels. The horns are shared between the radiometer and radar subsystems. The radar operates at a pulse repetition frequency (PRF) of 2.86 kHz (350 ms period) with an 8% duty cycle, switching cyclically between VV, HH, and VH transmit/receive modes. The radiometers integrate for 300 ms between the radar pulses, switching cyclically between the antenna, antenna plus noise diode, and internal reference load, first in V-polarization and then in H-polarization. The radar and radiometer outputs are averaged by the instrument data system at 0.5-second intervals. Aircraft data including location, altitude, attitude and heading, and downward-looking thermal IR temperatures, are recorded at 1-s intervals and inserted into the PALS data stream. In post-processing of the data, the 0.5-s radiometer and radar data are averaged and time-registered to the aircraft data at the 1-s intervals. Because of the relatively slow ~0.07 km s-1 C-130 aircraft velocity, the radiometer effective integration time available at 1-km altitude is about 3 s per footprint. The resulting radiometric sensitivities (DT) per footprint are 0.15 K and 0.35 K at L and S bands, respectively. Though the antennas are time-shared between the radiometer and radar channels, the high sampling rate relative to footprint size permits collocation of the time-averaged radiometer and radar footprints. The radar pulse width places a lower limit of about 3,000 ft on the altitude at which the radar can operate reliably. Thus, in SGP99 PALS was operated predominantly at this altitude, except for the low-altitude lake radiometer calibration flights during which the radar was turned off.

 

Table 1

PALS Instrument Characteristics

 

Radiometer

Radar

Frequencies

1.41 and 2.69 GHz

1.26 and 3.15 GHz

Polarizations

V, H

VV, HH, VH

Antenna beamwidth

13o

Antenna gain, beam efficiency

23 dB, > 92 %

Cross-polarization isolation

-20 dB

Incidence angle

35 to 55o

Spatial resolution (at 1 km altitude)

0.4 km

RMS noise per footprint (at 1 km altitude)

0.2 to 0.3 k

 

noise equivalent sigma symbolo at 1 km altitude

 

< -45 dB

Calibration stability (in-flight)

0.1 k

0.1 dB

Transmit power, duty cycle

 

5 W, 8 %

3.3 SGP99 Site Description

A description of the SGP99 experiment, including field site descriptions and aircraft flight lines, is provided in the SGP99 Experiment Plan. Landcover conditions in July in the little Washita region included bare fields (harvested winter wheat); alfalfa, corn and other crops; grass pasture; and clumped trees (more extensive towards the eastern part of the basin). The topography is gently rolling, with large regions of both coarse and fine soil textures. The field sections are 800 m on a side.

 

3.4 Flight Lines

The C-130 flew at a nominal altitude of 3,000 feet over SGP99 flight lines 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12 in the Little Washita basin region near Chickasha, OK. It also flew over line 13 near El Reno, OK. The Little Washita flight lines are shown in Fig. 2. On July 8 lines 8 through 12 were flown as shown. On July 9, 11, 12, 13, and 14, line 11 was not flown but seven flight lines were added parallel to and between lines 9 and 10, to provide contiguous mapping of the rectangular region bounded approximately by latitudes 34.905 N and 34.965 N, and longitudes 98.35 W and 97.90 W. For the mapping purpose the east end of line 9 was extended to the same longitude as the east end of line 10,

Flight track map
and the west end of line 10 was extended to the same longitude as the west end of line 9. The additional lines were designated lines 9b, 9c, 9d, 9e, 9f, 9g, and 9h (line 9a is the extended line 9). Line 8 over Lake Ellsworth was flown at the beginning of each flight day to obtain calibration data over a large water body of known emissivity characteristics. The data from line 8 were used as an external calibration of the combined radiometer and antenna system. The C-130 flights were made generally between the hours of 8:30 am and 1:00 pm. On July 10 a rainstorm moved through the area providing an opportunity to observe wet and then drying conditions from July 11 to July 14. Fig. 3 shows a view from the C-130 along a flight line just south of line 10, looking North, illustrating the typical pasture and tree surface cover. Lake Burtschi is visible at the upper right in the figure.

4. Data Description

 

4.1 Data Quality

The PALS data were calibrated as described in Wilson et al. (2001). PALS data for all flight lines were georeferenced in latitude and longitude using airborne GPS location, attitude, and altitude data from the C-130 instrumentation, and knowledge of the antenna pointing geometry.

Site

Figures 4(a) and (b) show the PALS 1.41- and 2.69-GHz brightness temperatures along flight line 9a (latitude 34.9094 N, West-to-East) on the days immediately before and after the rain event that occurred on July 10. The vertical (V) and horizontal (H) brightness temperatures are shown, along with surface (skin) temperatures from a nadir-viewing thermal infrared (IR) sensor on board the aircraft. The data shown are 1-s samples. The flight line is about 40 km in length. Each such flight line took about 10 minutes of flight time, not including aircraft turns and alignment at the ends of the lines.

The data quality exhibited in Figures 4(a) and (b) is representative of all data acquired on West-to-East flight lines. There were few problems with RFI on these lines except for localized interference observed in the L-band data when flying directly over electric power transmission lines. More RFI was observed on East-to-West flight lines at both L and S bands. Much of this is low-level interference, thought initially to be solar radiation entering the antenna sidelobes, or reflected off the land surface into the main antenna beam. This is consistent with the orientation of the antenna horns at the rear of the aircraft (pointing downward and eastward at 40o from nadir) and the position of the sun during the morning flights. Closer investigation determined, however, that the interference occurred mostly as short spikes of 5 to 10 K or higher with a periodicity of about 5 s. It appears likely that a ground-based azimuth-scanning radar at a nearby airfield was the actual source of the interference.

Figure 4(c) shows the PALS 1.26-GHz radar backscatter data (so) along line 9a. The VV and VH channels are shown. The so data indicate an increase from July 9 to July 11of 3 to 7 dB over the western portion of the flight line (larger in the VV channel) caused by the increased soil moisture. The fluctuations in so caused by roughness and vegetation heterogeneity are more pronounced, relative to the soil moisture effect, than with the TB data. This is consistent with the greater sensitivity of so to vegetation and roughness.

Figures 4(a) through 4(c)

4.2 File Nomenclature

Each PALS data file is an ASCII text file containing one flight line of radiometer or radar data. The filenames have the extension '.ftr' for radiometer data and '.red' for radar data. The filename provides the date and approximate start time of the pass as follows:

'aabbccdd.ftr' (radiometer),

or

'aabbccdd.red' (radar)

where: aa = month

bb = day

cc = hour

dd = minute

Table 2 below shows the flight lines and corresponding data files for each flight day of the mission. The letter designation of the flight lines after the hyphen refers to the general heading of the aircraft (n-north, e-east, w-west, s-south). The radiometer and radar instruments were operated by different computers, hence in some cases the start times of the data files are slightly different. "cc hour" refers to local time. Lines containing bad data, and some repeat lines (not all), have been removed from the data.

Table 2
Listing of Data Files
July 08
Pass#Line#Radiometer Data FilesRadar Data FilesComments
19-e07080857.ftr07080857.red 
210-e07080907.ftr07080907.red 
311-n07080918.ftr07080917.red 
412-n07080926.ftr07080924.red 
July 09
Pass#Line#Radiometer Data FilesRadar Data FilesComments
19a-e07090904.ftr07090905.red 
29b-w07090915.ftr07090915.red 
39c-e07090926.ftr07090926.red 
49d-w07090935.ftr07090935.red 
59e-e07090946.ftr07090946.red 
69f-w07090955.ftr07090955.red 
79g-e07091005.ftr07091006.red 
89h-w07091014.ftr07091014.red 
910-e07091024.ftr07091024.red 
1012-n07091033.ftr07091033.red 
July 11
Pass#Line#Radiometer Data FilesRadar Data FilesComments
19a-e07110900.ftr07110900.red 
29b-w07110912.ftr07110912.red 
39c-e07110922.ftr07110923.red 
49d-w07110933.ftr07110934.red 
59e-e07110943.ftr07110943.red 
69g-e107111003.ftr07111003.red 
79f-w07111014.ftr07111014.redSignificant RFI (edited)
89g-e207111023.ftr07111023.redFlew 9g twice(aborted 9f the first time)
99h-w07111034.ftr07111034.redSignificant RFI (edited)
1010-e07111043.ftr07111044.red 
1112-n07111108.ftr07111108.red 
1213-e07111148.ftr07111149.red 
July 12
Pass#Line#Radiometer Data FilesRadar Data FilesComments
19a-e07120835.ftr07120835.red 
29c-e07120856.ftr07120856.red 
39d-w07120906.ftr07120906.red 
49f-w07120932.ftr07120932.redRFI (edited)
59g-e07120943.ftr07120943.red 
69h-w07120954.ftr07120954.redRFI (edited)
710-e07121006.ftr07121006.red 
89b-w07121017.ftr07121017.redRFI (edited)
99e-e07121029.ftr07121029.red 
1012-n07121039.ftr07121039.red 
1113-e07121053.ftr07121053.red 
July 13
Pass#Line#Radiometer Data FilesRadar Data FilesComments
19a-e07130946.ftr07130946.redShortened line
29a-w07130955.ftr07130955.redRFI (edited)
39b-e07131006.ftr07131006.red 
49b-w07131015.ftr07131016.redRFI (edited)
59c-e07131026.ftr07131026.red 
69c-w07131035.ftr07131035.redRFI (edited)
79d-e07131046.ftr07131046.red 
89d-w07131056.ftr07131055.redRFI (edited)
99e-e07131107.ftr07131107.red 
109e-w07131116.ftr07131116.red 
119f-e07131127.ftr07131127.red 
129f-w07131137.ftr07131137.red 
139g-e07131159.ftr07131159.red 
149g-w07131208.ftr07131208.red 
159h-e07131219.ftr07131219.red 
169h-w07131228.ftr07131228.red 
1710-e07131238.ftr07131238.red 
1812-n07131249.ftr07131249.red 
1912-s07131254.ftr07131254.red 
2010-w07131300.ftr07131300.red 
2113-e07131322.ftr07131323.red 
2213-w07131328.ftr07131328.red 
July 14
Pass#Line#Radiometer Data FilesRadar Data FilesComments
113-w07141020.ftr Radar not operating
21a-s07141032.ftr Radar not operating
39a-e07141120.ftr07141120.red 
49b-w07141130.ftr07141130.red 
59c-e07141140.ftr07141141.red 
69d-w07141151.ftr07141151.redRFI (edited)
79e-e07141201.ftr07141201.red 
89f-w07141210.ftr07141210.redRFI (edited)
99g-e07141221.ftr07141221.red 
109h-w07141230.ftr07141230.red 
1110-e07141240.ftr07141241.redShortened line
1212-n07141251.ftr07141251.redData gaps
1310-w07141259.ftr07141259.red 
1413-e07141319.ftr07141318.red 

 

 

4.3 Radiometer Data Format

Within each ASCII text file the radiometer data are arranged in 12 columns as follows (Table 3):

Table 3
ColumnData
1Instrument time (sec) (from beginning of day)
2L-band H-pol brightness temperature (TB) (K)
3L-band V-pol TB (K)
4S-band H-pol TB (K)
5S-band V-pol TB (K)
6Nadir-looking thermal infrared surface temperature (C)
7Antenna beam incidence angle (deg) (Nominally 40 degrees, but includes aircraft attitude effects)
8Antenna polarization rotation angle (deg) (Angle of the V and H polarizations of the horn antennas relative to nominal, including aircraft attitude effects)
9Footprint latitude (deg) (corrected for aircraft altitude and attitude)
10Footprint longitude (deg) (corrected for aircraft altitude and attitude )
11Antenna azimuth viewing angle relative to North (deg) (East is 90 deg)
12Aircraft altitude (m)

 

4.4 Radar Data Format

Within each ASCII text file the radar data are arranged in 26 columns as follows (Table 4):

Table 4
ColumnData
1Instrument time (sec) (local time) from the beginning of the day
2Aircraft GPS time (sec) (UT) from the beginning of the day
3Footprint latitude (deg)
4Footprint longitude (deg)
5Antenna azimuth viewing angle relative to North (deg) (East is 90 deg)
6Antenna polarization rotation angle (deg) (Angle of the V and H polarizations of the horn antennas relative to nominal)
7Range from surface footprint to aircraft (m)
8Antenna beam incidence angle (deg)
9L-band sigma0_HH (dB)
10L-band sigma0_VV (dB)
11L-band sigma0_VH (dB)
12S-band sigma0_HH (dB)
13S-band sigma0_VV (dB)
14S-band sigma0_VH (dB)
15Normalized real part of L-band HH and VV complex correlation
16Normalized imaginary part of L-band HH and VV complex correlation
17Normalized real part of L-band HH and VH complex correlation
18Normalized imaginary part of L-band HH and VH complex correlation
19Normalized real part of L-band VV and VH complex correlation
20Normalized imaginary part of L-band VV and VH complex correlation
21Normalized real part of S-band HH and VV complex correlation
22Normalized imaginary part of S-band HH and VV complex correlation
23Normalized real part of S-band HH and VH complex correlation
24Normalized imaginary part of S-band HH and VH complex correlation
25Normalized real part of S-band VV and VH complex correlation
26Normalized imaginary part of S-band VV and VH complex correlation

5. Reference

Wilson, W. J., S. H. Yueh, S. J. Dinardo, S. Chazanoff, F. K. Li, and Y. Rahmat-Samii (2001): Passive Active L- and S-band (PALS) microwave sensor for ocean salinity and soil moisture measurements, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Rem. Sens. (in press).



Last updated: February 28, 2008 12:36:11 GMT
Page Author: Hydrology Data Support Team -- hydrology-disc@listserv.gsfc.nasa.gov
Web Curator: -- Website Curator: Anthony Drake
NASA official: Steve Kempler, GES DISC Manager -- Steven.J.Kempler@nasa.gov